Week 3 2022 · September 25, 2022
Texans at Bears, Week 3 2022: who deserved to win?
The Bears beat the Texans 23–20 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Texans had the bounces: drops alone were worth 13 points of win probability to the Texans.
Before kickoff the Bears were 59% favorites. The game turned on a luck play (Q4, 1:52 left): Offensive Holding on the Texans, 10 yards, worth 15 points of win probability to the Bears. The biggest single swing (Q4, 1:13 left): the Texans were stopped on 3rd & 1.
Final
| 20 | |
| 23 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +28 Bears lucky · −28 Texans
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Texans win 3, Bears win 7.
- 1 HOU 26 CHI 9
- 2 HOU 16 CHI 7
- 3 HOU 20 CHI 17
- 4 HOU 17 CHI 19
- 5 HOU 19 CHI 24
- 6 HOU 14 CHI 22
- 7 HOU 7 CHI 20
- 8 HOU 22 CHI 37
- 9 HOU 10 CHI 29
- 10 HOU 17 CHI 44
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Texans win 28% of them, Bears 72%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Bears by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Texans by 17+ | 3.5% |
| Texans by 9–16 | 8.1% |
| Texans by 1–8 | 15.5% |
| Level after regulation | 3.2% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 23.8% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 21.8% |
| Bears by 17+ | 24.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Santos, 47 yds made · 73% expected
- C. Santos, 50 yds made · 68% expected
- K. Fairbairn, 39 yds made · 88% expected
- K. Fairbairn, 23 yds made · 98% expected
- C. Santos, 30 yds made · 96% expected
Penalties: Texans 3 for 25 yards, Bears 6 for 32 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 0:45 | False Start on the Bears, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% HOU +0.7 pts |
| Q2 13:01 | Defensive Holding on the Bears, 5 yards | +2% HOU +1.0 pts |
| Q2 1:01 | Offensive Holding on the Bears (Cole Kmet), 7 yards | +3% HOU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 13:17 | Illegal Contact on the Bears (Kindle Vildor), 5 yards | +2% HOU +0.7 pts |
| Q4 9:04 | False Start on the Bears, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% HOU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 7:32 | Illegal Substitution on the Texans, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% CHI +0.7 pts |
| Q4 6:46 | False Start on the Bears, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% HOU +0.3 pts |
| Q4 4:32 | Offensive Holding on the Texans, 10 yards | +8% CHI +1.1 pts |
| Q4 1:52 | Offensive Holding on the Texans, 10 yards | +15% CHI +0.9 pts |
Texans penalties, every game · Bears penalties, every game · All teams, 2022
When it happened
Bears’ chance of winning
As low as 35% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 2:00 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +13% HOU | CHI: Field goal |
| 2 | Q4 15:00 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expectedThe Bears threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 48% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +14% HOU | CHI: Punt |
| 3 | Q4 6:39 | The Texans fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +14% HOU | HOU: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 5:18 | The Texans converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +14% HOU | HOU: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 3:55 | The Texans got away with an interception-worthy throwInterceptions · 46% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +13% HOU | HOU: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 1:52 | The game turned hereOffensive Holding on the Texans, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +15% CHI | CHI: Field goal |
| 7 | Q4 1:13 | The Texans were stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expectedThe Texans threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 45% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +58% CHI | – |
| 8 | Q4 0:03 | C. Santos made 30-yard field goalKicks · 96% expected for him | +14% CHI | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Jaylon Johnson (CHI CB), out · 0.9 pts
- Justin Britt (HOU C), out (IR) · 0.5 pts
- Tavierre Thomas (HOU CB), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Texans 27% · Bears 73%
- Final margin
- Bears by 3
- Luck in points
- 0.8 for the Texans
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Bears by 3.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Texans 28% · Bears 72% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2022 games ·
Texans ·
Bears
More from Week 3 2022
- Steelers at Browns CLE 29–17 · replay 83% for the winner
- Ravens at Patriots BAL 37–26 · replay 68% for the winner
- Bills at Dolphins MIA 21–19 · replay 60% for the winner
- Bengals at Jets CIN 27–12 · replay 94% for the winner
- Lions at Vikings MIN 28–24 · replay 77% for the winner
- Chiefs at Colts IND 20–17 · replay 5% for the winner
- Raiders at Titans TEN 24–22 · replay 54% for the winner
- Saints at Panthers CAR 22–14 · replay 78% for the winner
- Eagles at Commanders PHI 24–8 · replay 93% for the winner
- Jaguars at Chargers JAX 38–10 · replay 86% for the winner
- Falcons at Seahawks ATL 27–23 · replay 54% for the winner
- Packers at Buccaneers GB 14–12 · replay 53% for the winner
- Rams at Cardinals LA 20–12 · replay 81% for the winner
- 49ers at Broncos DEN 11–10 · replay 45% for the winner
- Cowboys at Giants DAL 23–16 · replay 96% for the winner