Week 14 2023 · December 10, 2023
Lions at Bears, Week 14 2023: who deserved to win?
The Bears beat the Lions 28–13, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Bears win 8 of 10.
An off day for the Lions: their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 15%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Lions were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q3, 1:42 left): the Bears converted 4th & 13, worth 25 points of win probability to the Bears.
Final
| 13 | |
| 28 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +15 Bears about even · −15 Lions
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Lions win 2, Bears win 8.
- 1 DET 48 CHI 37
- 2 DET 24 CHI 21
- 3 DET 24 CHI 26
- 4 DET 17 CHI 22
- 5 DET 19 CHI 27
- 6 DET 7 CHI 19
- 7 DET 21 CHI 36
- 8 DET 13 CHI 31
- 9 DET 3 CHI 27
- 10 DET 12 CHI 43
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Lions
Their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 15%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
39 points apart for the Lions: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lions offenseEPA per play gained | +0.01 | +0.15 | worse by 0.14 |
| Lions defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.10 | +0.11 | better by 0.02 |
| Bears offenseEPA per play gained | +0.10 | +0.09 | better by 0.01 |
| Bears defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.01 | +0.15 | better by 0.14 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Lions win 15% of them, Bears 85%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Bears by 15.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Lions by 17+ | 1.3% |
| Lions by 9–16 | 3.1% |
| Lions by 1–8 | 9.7% |
| Level after regulation | 1.9% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 20.1% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 24.3% |
| Bears by 17+ | 39.7% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Santos, 46 yds made · 73% expected
- C. Santos, 25 yds made · 98% expected
- C. Santos, 28 yds made · 97% expected
- Extra point missed · 93% expected
- Extra point missed · 93% expected
Penalties: Lions 8 for 59 yards, Bears 4 for 35 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 7:44 | Tripping on the Lions, 15 yards | +3% CHI +1.5 pts |
| Q1 3:54 | Defensive Holding on the Lions (Alex Anzalone), 5 yards | +1% CHI +0.8 pts |
| Q1 3:25 | Unnecessary Roughness on the Lions (Alex Anzalone), 15 yards | +3% CHI +1.8 pts |
| Q1 0:01 | Delay of Game on the Lions, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% CHI +0.7 pts |
| Q2 14:12 | Illegal Block Above the Waist on the Bears (Eddie Jackson), 10 yards | +2% DET +1.0 pts |
| Q2 9:44 | False Start on the Lions, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% CHI +0.9 pts |
| Q3 10:20 | Defensive Pass Interference on the Lions (Jerry Jacobs), 4 yards | 0% DET +0.1 pts |
| Q3 8:38 | False Start on the Lions, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% CHI +0.8 pts |
| Q3 7:36 | Offensive Holding on the Bears, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +12% DET +3.1 pts |
| Q4 6:12 | False Start on the Lions, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CHI +0.6 pts |
| Q4 4:31 | Offensive Holding on the Bears, 10 yards | 0% DET +1.2 pts |
| Q4 2:44 | Defensive Offside on the Bears (Rasheem Green), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CHI 0.0 pts |
Lions penalties, every game · Bears penalties, every game · All teams, 2023
When it happened
Bears’ chance of winning
As low as 33% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 2:06 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +7% DET | CHI: Field goal |
| 2 | Q2 9:01 | The Lions converted 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +9% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 3:54 | The Lions converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 61% expected | +7% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q3 10:38 | The Bears converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +9% CHI | CHI: Field goal |
| 5 | Q3 7:36 | Offensive Holding on the Bears, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +12% DET | DET: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 3:26 | The Bears converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +8% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 1:42 | The Bears converted 4th & 133rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +25% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 14:19 | The Bears converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +8% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Frank Ragnow (DET C), out · 0.8 pts
- Alim McNeill (DET DT), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Scott Daly (DET LS), out (IR) · 0.1 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Lions 10% · Bears 90%
- Final margin
- Bears by 15
- Luck in points
- 9.4 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Bears by 5.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Lions 15% · Bears 85% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 14 2023 games ·
Lions ·
Bears
More from Week 14 2023
- Patriots at Steelers NE 21–18 · replay 47% for the winner
- Panthers at Saints NO 28–6 · replay 93% for the winner
- Texans at Jets NYJ 30–6 · replay 65% for the winner
- Colts at Bengals CIN 34–14 · replay 88% for the winner
- Jaguars at Browns CLE 31–27 · replay 59% for the winner
- Rams at Ravens BAL 37–31 · replay 87% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Falcons TB 29–25 · replay 15% for the winner
- Vikings at Raiders MIN 3–0 · replay 88% for the winner
- Seahawks at 49ers SF 28–16 · replay 97% for the winner
- Bills at Chiefs BUF 20–17 · replay 53% for the winner
- Broncos at Chargers DEN 24–7 · replay 86% for the winner
- Eagles at Cowboys DAL 33–13 · replay 74% for the winner
- Packers at Giants NYG 24–22 · replay 27% for the winner
- Titans at Dolphins TEN 28–27 · replay 5% for the winner