Week 2 2025 · September 15, 2025
Chargers at Raiders, Week 2 2025: who deserved to win?
The Chargers beat the Raiders 20–9 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Raiders had the bounces: kicks alone were worth 10 points of win probability to the Raiders.
Before kickoff the Chargers were 60% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 6:05 left): the Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 15, worth 16 points of win probability to the Chargers.
Final
| 20 | |
| 9 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +25 Chargers lucky · −25 Raiders
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Chargers win 7, Raiders win 3.
- 1 LAC 38 LV 13
- 2 LAC 24 LV 6
- 3 LAC 27 LV 13
- 4 LAC 24 LV 13
- 5 LAC 20 LV 13
- 6 LAC 13 LV 9
- 7 LAC 16 LV 13
- 8 LAC 14 LV 17
- 9 LAC 16 LV 23
- 10 LAC 17 LV 31
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Chargers win 75% of them, Raiders 25%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Chargers by 11.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Chargers by 17+ | 23.1% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 22.4% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 26.3% |
| Level after regulation | 5.1% |
| Raiders by 1–8 | 14.3% |
| Raiders by 9–16 | 6.4% |
| Raiders by 17+ | 2.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Dicker, 38 yds made · 93% expected
- D. Carlson, 54 yds made · 71% expected
- D. Carlson, 40 yds made · 89% expected
- C. Dicker, 20 yds made · 100% expected
- D. Carlson, 37 yds made · 93% expected
Penalties: Chargers 6 for 33 yards, Raiders 5 for 47 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 10:41 | Defensive Pass Interference on the Chargers (Cam Hart), 8 yards | +6% LV +1.7 pts |
| Q1 8:51 | False Start on the Chargers, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% LV +0.6 pts |
| Q1 2:23 | Offensive Offside on the Chargers (KeAndre Lambert-Smith), 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +6% LV +1.8 pts |
| Q1 1:54 | Unnecessary Roughness on the Raiders (Isaiah Pola-Mao), 12 yards | +4% LAC +2.1 pts |
| Q1 1:32 | Defensive Too Many Men on Field on the Raiders, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LV +0.1 pts |
| Q2 15:00 | Illegal Contact on the Chargers (Daiyan Henley), 5 yards | +1% LV +0.5 pts |
| Q2 13:37 | Offensive Holding on the Raiders, 10 yards | +3% LAC +1.2 pts |
| Q3 7:30 | Offensive Holding on the Raiders (Ian Thomas), 10 yards | +2% LAC +0.9 pts |
| Q4 14:20 | Defensive Offside on the Chargers (Bud Dupree), 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% LV +0.9 pts |
| Q4 12:36 | Offensive Holding on the Raiders, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +5% LAC +1.6 pts |
| Q4 2:09 | Illegal Formation on the Chargers, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | 0% LV +1.5 pts |
Chargers penalties, every game · Raiders penalties, every game · All teams, 2025
When it happened
Raiders’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 55%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:46 | The Raiders converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +9% LV | LV: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 10:41 | Defensive Pass Interference on the Chargers (Cam Hart), 8 yardsJudgment calls · 5 flags in 660 snaps before, position avg 1 per 213 | +6% LV | LV: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 9:53 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +9% LAC | LV: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 9:07 | D. Carlson made 54-yard field goalKicks · 71% expected for him, 52 of 69 from 45+ before | +8% LV | LV: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 14:02 | The Raiders converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +8% LV | LV: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 5:21 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 70% expected | +6% LAC | LV: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 1:14 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 33% expectedThe Raiders threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 49% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +8% LAC | LV: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 6:05 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 153rd & 4th downs · 19% expectedThe Raiders were intercepted on a well-placed throwInterceptions · 0% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +16% LAC | LV: Turnover on downs |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Jackson Powers-Johnson (LV G), out · 0.2 pts
- Rashawn Slater (LAC T), out (IR) · 1.0 pts
- Elijah Molden (LAC CB), out · 0.5 pts
- Josh Harris (LAC LS), out (IR) · 0.1 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Chargers 97% · Raiders 3%
- Final margin
- Chargers by 11
- Luck in points
- 1.3 for the Raiders
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Chargers by 12.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Chargers 75% · Raiders 25% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2025 games ·
Chargers ·
Raiders
More from Week 2 2025
- Commanders at Packers GB 27–18 · replay 92% for the winner
- Bills at Jets BUF 30–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Bears at Lions DET 52–21 · replay 100% for the winner
- Browns at Ravens BAL 41–17 · replay 86% for the winner
- Jaguars at Bengals CIN 31–27 · replay 69% for the winner
- Rams at Titans LA 33–19 · replay 96% for the winner
- Patriots at Dolphins NE 33–27 · replay 28% for the winner
- Giants at Cowboys DAL 40–37 · replay 16% for the winner
- Seahawks at Steelers SEA 31–17 · replay 87% for the winner
- 49ers at Saints SF 26–21 · replay 77% for the winner
- Panthers at Cardinals ARI 27–22 · replay 87% for the winner
- Broncos at Colts IND 29–28 · replay 67% for the winner
- Eagles at Chiefs PHI 20–17 · replay 10% for the winner
- Falcons at Vikings ATL 22–6 · replay 87% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Texans TB 20–19 · replay 77% for the winner